lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11921053181239-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:21:53 +0300
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, TAKANO Ryousei <takano@...-inc.co.jp>,
	--cc@...helsinki.fi, "David S.Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [TCP]: Create tcp_sacktag_state.

From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

It is difficult to break out the inner-logic of
tcp_sacktag_write_queue() into worker functions because
so many local variables get updated in-place.

Start to overcome this by creating a structure block
of state variables that can be passed around into
worker routines.

[I made minor tweaks due to rebase/reordering of stuff
in tcp-2.6 tree, and dropped found_dup_sack & dup_sack
from state -ij]

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 0a42e93..1f6cbce 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static int tcp_mark_lost_retrans(struct sock *sk, u32 received_upto)
 	return flag;
 }
 
+struct tcp_sacktag_state {
+	unsigned int flag;
+	int reord;
+	int prior_fackets;
+	u32 highest_sack_end_seq;
+	int first_sack_index;
+};
+
 static int tcp_check_dsack(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
 			   struct tcp_sack_block_wire *sp, int num_sacks,
 			   u32 prior_snd_una)
@@ -1240,26 +1248,23 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 	struct tcp_sack_block_wire *sp = (struct tcp_sack_block_wire *)(ptr+2);
 	struct sk_buff *cached_skb;
 	int num_sacks = (ptr[1] - TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE)>>3;
-	int reord = tp->packets_out;
-	int prior_fackets;
-	u32 highest_sack_end_seq = 0;
-	int flag = 0;
-	int found_dup_sack = 0;
+	struct tcp_sacktag_state state;
+	int found_dup_sack;
 	int cached_fack_count;
 	int i;
-	int first_sack_index;
+	int force_one_sack;
+
+	state.flag = 0;
 
 	if (!tp->sacked_out) {
 		if (WARN_ON(tp->fackets_out))
 			tp->fackets_out = 0;
 		tp->highest_sack = tp->snd_una;
 	}
-	prior_fackets = tp->fackets_out;
 
-	found_dup_sack = tcp_check_dsack(tp, ack_skb, sp,
-					 num_sacks, prior_snd_una);
+	found_dup_sack = tcp_check_dsack(tp, ack_skb, sp, num_sacks, prior_snd_una);
 	if (found_dup_sack)
-		flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
+		state.flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
 
 	/* Eliminate too old ACKs, but take into
 	 * account more or less fresh ones, they can
@@ -1272,18 +1277,18 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 	 * if the only SACK change is the increase of the end_seq of
 	 * the first block then only apply that SACK block
 	 * and use retrans queue hinting otherwise slowpath */
-	flag = 1;
+	force_one_sack = 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < num_sacks; i++) {
 		__be32 start_seq = sp[i].start_seq;
 		__be32 end_seq = sp[i].end_seq;
 
 		if (i == 0) {
 			if (tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq != start_seq)
-				flag = 0;
+				force_one_sack = 0;
 		} else {
 			if ((tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq != start_seq) ||
 			    (tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq != end_seq))
-				flag = 0;
+				force_one_sack = 0;
 		}
 		tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq = start_seq;
 		tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq = end_seq;
@@ -1294,8 +1299,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 		tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq = 0;
 	}
 
-	first_sack_index = 0;
-	if (flag)
+	state.first_sack_index = 0;
+	if (force_one_sack)
 		num_sacks = 1;
 	else {
 		int j;
@@ -1313,17 +1318,14 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 					sp[j+1] = tmp;
 
 					/* Track where the first SACK block goes to */
-					if (j == first_sack_index)
-						first_sack_index = j+1;
+					if (j == state.first_sack_index)
+						state.first_sack_index = j+1;
 				}
 
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* clear flag as used for different purpose in following code */
-	flag = 0;
-
 	/* Use SACK fastpath hint if valid */
 	cached_skb = tp->fastpath_skb_hint;
 	cached_fack_count = tp->fastpath_cnt_hint;
@@ -1332,12 +1334,16 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 		cached_fack_count = 0;
 	}
 
+	state.reord = tp->packets_out;
+	state.prior_fackets = tp->fackets_out;
+	state.highest_sack_end_seq = 0;
+
 	for (i=0; i<num_sacks; i++, sp++) {
 		struct sk_buff *skb;
 		__u32 start_seq = ntohl(sp->start_seq);
 		__u32 end_seq = ntohl(sp->end_seq);
 		int fack_count;
-		int dup_sack = (found_dup_sack && (i == first_sack_index));
+		int dup_sack = (found_dup_sack && (i == state.first_sack_index));
 
 		if (!tcp_is_sackblock_valid(tp, dup_sack, start_seq, end_seq)) {
 			if (dup_sack) {
@@ -1360,7 +1366,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 
 		/* Event "B" in the comment above. */
 		if (after(end_seq, tp->high_seq))
-			flag |= FLAG_DATA_LOST;
+			state.flag |= FLAG_DATA_LOST;
 
 		tcp_for_write_queue_from(skb, sk) {
 			int in_sack;
@@ -1371,7 +1377,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 
 			cached_skb = skb;
 			cached_fack_count = fack_count;
-			if (i == first_sack_index) {
+			if (i == state.first_sack_index) {
 				tp->fastpath_skb_hint = skb;
 				tp->fastpath_cnt_hint = fack_count;
 			}
@@ -1401,12 +1407,12 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 				if (sacked&TCPCB_RETRANS) {
 					if ((dup_sack && in_sack) &&
 					    (sacked&TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
-						reord = min(fack_count, reord);
+						state.reord = min(fack_count, state.reord);
 				} else {
 					/* If it was in a hole, we detected reordering. */
-					if (fack_count < prior_fackets &&
+					if (fack_count < state.prior_fackets &&
 					    !(sacked&TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
-						reord = min(fack_count, reord);
+						state.reord = min(fack_count, state.reord);
 				}
 
 				/* Nothing to do; acked frame is about to be dropped. */
@@ -1435,8 +1441,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 					 * which was in hole. It is reordering.
 					 */
 					if (!(sacked & TCPCB_RETRANS) &&
-					    fack_count < prior_fackets)
-						reord = min(fack_count, reord);
+					    fack_count < state.prior_fackets)
+						state.reord = min(fack_count, state.reord);
 
 					if (sacked & TCPCB_LOST) {
 						TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked &= ~TCPCB_LOST;
@@ -1452,15 +1458,15 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 					 * Clearing correct due to in-order walk
 					 */
 					if (after(end_seq, tp->frto_highmark)) {
-						flag &= ~FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED;
+						state.flag &= ~FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED;
 					} else {
 						if (!(sacked & TCPCB_RETRANS))
-							flag |= FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED;
+							state.flag |= FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED;
 					}
 				}
 
 				TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked |= TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED;
-				flag |= FLAG_DATA_SACKED;
+				state.flag |= FLAG_DATA_SACKED;
 				tp->sacked_out += tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
 
 				if (fack_count > tp->fackets_out)
@@ -1468,11 +1474,11 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 
 				if (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->highest_sack)) {
 					tp->highest_sack = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
-					highest_sack_end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
+					state.highest_sack_end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
 				}
 			} else {
 				if (dup_sack && (sacked&TCPCB_RETRANS))
-					reord = min(fack_count, reord);
+					state.reord = min(fack_count, state.reord);
 			}
 
 			/* D-SACK. We can detect redundant retransmission
@@ -1490,15 +1496,15 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 	}
 
 	if (tp->retrans_out &&
-	    after(highest_sack_end_seq, tp->lost_retrans_low) &&
+	    after(state.highest_sack_end_seq, tp->lost_retrans_low) &&
 	    icsk->icsk_ca_state == TCP_CA_Recovery)
-		flag |= tcp_mark_lost_retrans(sk, highest_sack_end_seq);
+		state.flag |= tcp_mark_lost_retrans(sk, state.highest_sack_end_seq);
 
 	tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
 
-	if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss &&
+	if ((state.reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss &&
 	    (!tp->frto_highmark || after(tp->snd_una, tp->frto_highmark)))
-		tcp_update_reordering(sk, ((tp->fackets_out + 1) - reord), 0);
+		tcp_update_reordering(sk, ((tp->fackets_out + 1) - state.reord), 0);
 
 #if FASTRETRANS_DEBUG > 0
 	BUG_TRAP((int)tp->sacked_out >= 0);
@@ -1506,7 +1512,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 	BUG_TRAP((int)tp->retrans_out >= 0);
 	BUG_TRAP((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) >= 0);
 #endif
-	return flag;
+	return state.flag;
 }
 
 /* If we receive more dupacks than we expected counting segments
-- 
1.5.0.6

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ