[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071011.174026.26976971.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: takano@...-inc.co.jp, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: Regression in net-2.6.24?
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:31:49 -0700
> You don't need to re-read the status register and process the PHY irq's inside loop.
> Try this:
Are you sure? What if a PHY interrupt comes in during the loop?
I'm just preserving the semantics of the driver when ->poll()
is invoked multiple times per interrupt.
And I think preserving that makes sense while we're purely
trying to fix this bug, so we don't add some new ones.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists