netdev - Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <470F6927.9040505@trash.net>
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:31:35 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
CC:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables:  mangle table obsoletes filter table

Al Boldi wrote:
>>>The problem is that people think they are safe with the filter table,
>>>when in fact they need the prerouting chain to seal things.  Right now
>>>this is only possible in the mangle table.
>>
>>Why do they need PREROUTING?
> 
> 
> Well, for example to stop any transient packets being forwarded.  You could 
> probably hack around this using mark's, but you can't stop the implied route 
> lookup, unless you stop it in prerouting.


This also works fine in FORWARD with a little extra overhead.
If you really have to save resources, you should use PREROUTING/raw
to also avoid the creation of a connection tracking entry.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html