netdev - Re: Bonding support for eth1394?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adair5bm3jf.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:34:44 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Karl Svec <karlsvec@...il.com>,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bonding support for eth1394?

 > The bonding sources have a few occurrences of EOPNOTSUPP.  Unless I
 > missed something, they are all related to setting the hardware address
 > of the interface.  AFAICS this is impossible with IP over FireWire.  If
 > it is crucial to bonding to be able to change the slaves' hardware
 > addresses, then you are out of luck.

There are a few changes to the bonding driver pending that will add
support for bonding IP-over-InfiniBand interfaces.  IPoIB also cannot
change its HW address, so the patches address that issue.

Once those patches land, bonding eth1394 interfaces may "just work".

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html