[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071015145829.1acabefb@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:58:29 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eliezert@...adcom.com, andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BNX2X] round three
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Eliezer Tamir" <eliezert@...adcom.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:27:29 +0200
>
> > Unfortunately, the firmware code is different for LE and BE machines.
> > We had issues with the BE firmware that appear to be resolved.
> > Hopefully, the next version will have both.
>
> If this means we get two copies of the firmware, this should be
> rethought. The space cost of the firmware (both in terms of source
> code size and object code size) is already enormous.
>
> I would definitely prefer if there were only little-endian firmware,
> and the driver uses "cpu_to_le32()" and friends to access chip shared
> data structures.
>
> Most cpus have endian swapping loads and stores, accessible via
> cpu_to_le32p() and similar interfaces, so the cost on big-endian of
> doing things this way is very close to zero.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
What about using loadable firmware rather than building it into the driver?
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists