[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:47:13 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: netif_napi_add vs. multiple netdev's
Hi Stehphen !
The new netif_napi_add() function takes a netdev argument. In the EMAC
case, there is one NAPI instance working on behalf of multiple netdev's,
so that isn't very useful. For my EMAC patch (just posted to you & the
list), I'm not passing NULL, but I'm wondering what would be a good way
to handle netpoll here...
The way it's currently implemented, there's a list of NAPI's attached to
the netdev, so obviously, that won't work for my usage scenario.
I'm not sure what's the best data structure that would be suitable for
both N ndev's for 1 NAPI and 1 ndev for N NAPI's though... I could
allocate "stub" list heads and queue those up, but that's a bit gross...
Any better idea ?
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists