[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071016163724.28fc1df0@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:37:24 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netif_napi_add vs. multiple netdev's
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:10:35 -0700
>
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:47:13 +1000
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The way it's currently implemented, there's a list of NAPI's attached to
> > > the netdev, so obviously, that won't work for my usage scenario.
> >
> > sky2 driver has potentially 2 ports for 1 NAPI instance.
>
> And it's unfortunately buggy.
>
> For example, the sky2_suspend() code iterates over the ports
> and calls sky2_down() on each one that is up.
>
> That will call napi_disable() on the same NAPI instance if
> multiple ports are up, and thus hang the machine.
>
> This is why, Stephen, for the second time, I'm telling you
> that perhaps you should put the NAPI instance into the
> sky2_port struct.
It isn't possible, there is only one hardware IRQ, and one
common status buffer. I'll fix the suspend code, it has other
problems as well.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists