[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5640c7e00710151857p12a19bf2radf1972835b811d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:57:56 +1300
From: "Ian McDonald" <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>
To: "Yanping Du" <ypdu2001@...oo.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Will RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum options) be implemented in Linux tcp stack ?
On 10/16/07, Yanping Du <ypdu2001@...oo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
> strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
> implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
> options) in Linux tcp stack ? If yes, how soon will
> that be in ?
>
> Please kindly copy reply to my email address as I've
> not subscribed the netdev@ mailing list at present.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1146.html
>
> Thanks!
> -Yanping
>
>
Yanping,
The way that features get added to Linux is that someone interested
writes it. You can't just say - is this on the roadmap, as there is no
roadmap really!
I have been interested in network features from an academic point of
view and so I wrote what I needed (along with others) and that was
added to the Linux kernel.
So have a go at implementing it if you consider it important and come
back here with some patches. Then others will help review it until the
patches are good.
I will let others comment on whether the checksums are a good idea or not.
Ian
--
Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists