lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IhnTx-0003HF-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:33:17 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 9/12] [IPSEC]: Use the top IPv4 route's peer instead of the bottom

[IPSEC]: Use the top IPv4 route's peer instead of the bottom

For IPv4 we were using the bottom route's peer instead of the top one.
This is wrong because the peer is only used by TCP to keep track of
information about the TCP destination address which certainly does not
live in the bottom route.

This patch fixes that which allows us to get rid of the family check
since the bottom route could be IPv6 while the top one must always
be IPv4.

I've also changed the other fields which are IPv4-specific to get the
info from the top route instead of potentially bogus data from the
bottom route.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
---

 net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index bd07a98..f9b4e4f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
@@ -169,16 +169,16 @@ __xfrm4_bundle_create(struct xfrm_policy *policy, struct xfrm_state **xfrm, int
 		dst_prev->neighbour	= neigh_clone(rt->u.dst.neighbour);
 		dst_prev->input		= rt->u.dst.input;
 		dst_prev->output = dst_prev->xfrm->mode->afinfo->output;
-		if (dst_prev->xfrm->props.family == AF_INET && rt->peer)
-			atomic_inc(&rt->peer->refcnt);
-		x->u.rt.peer = rt->peer;
+		if (rt0->peer)
+			atomic_inc(&rt0->peer->refcnt);
+		x->u.rt.peer = rt0->peer;
 		/* Sheit... I remember I did this right. Apparently,
 		 * it was magically lost, so this code needs audit */
 		x->u.rt.rt_flags = rt0->rt_flags&(RTCF_BROADCAST|RTCF_MULTICAST|RTCF_LOCAL);
-		x->u.rt.rt_type = rt->rt_type;
+		x->u.rt.rt_type = rt0->rt_type;
 		x->u.rt.rt_src = rt0->rt_src;
 		x->u.rt.rt_dst = rt0->rt_dst;
-		x->u.rt.rt_gateway = rt->rt_gateway;
+		x->u.rt.rt_gateway = rt0->rt_gateway;
 		x->u.rt.rt_spec_dst = rt0->rt_spec_dst;
 		x->u.rt.idev = rt0->idev;
 		in_dev_hold(rt0->idev);
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void xfrm4_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
 
 	if (likely(xdst->u.rt.idev))
 		in_dev_put(xdst->u.rt.idev);
-	if (dst->xfrm && dst->xfrm->props.family == AF_INET && likely(xdst->u.rt.peer))
+	if (likely(xdst->u.rt.peer))
 		inet_putpeer(xdst->u.rt.peer);
 	xfrm_dst_destroy(xdst);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists