lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017150818.0e878846@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:08:18 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP port randomization

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST)
Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is it normal that TCP port randomization (tested with 2.6.22) works only 
> when explicitly binding to a IP address:
> 
> 
> --- cut here ---
> root@fw1:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> root@fw1:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> root@fw1:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> 
> 23:11:11.896126 IP 192.168.129.2.37839 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:12.146573 IP 192.168.129.2.37840 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:12.396488 IP 192.168.129.2.37841 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> --- cut here ---
> 
> 
> --- cut here ---
> root@fw1:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> root@fw1:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> root@fw1:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> 
> 23:11:31.704391 IP 192.168.129.2.57204 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:34.400048 IP 192.168.129.2.14512 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:34.606707 IP 192.168.129.2.20117 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> --- cut here ---
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  				Krzysztof Olędzki

It is a expected side effect. The starting point for the search
is based on hash(srcaddr, dstaddr, dstport, secret).
You are using same source, dest and port so yes it will stay
the same until rekeying occurs.
The secret only changes every 5min same as TCP initial sequence number.



-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ