[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4716A0EA.4050906@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:55:22 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Don Fry <pcnet32@...izon.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: fix non-napi packet reception
Don Fry wrote:
> Recent changes to the driver for the new napi API broke the reception of packets when in
> non-napi mode. The initialization of napi.weight was removed for the non-napi case
> leaving the value zero.
>
> Tested NAPI and non-NAPI on x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Fry <pcnet32@...izon.net>
> ---
> --- linux-2.6.23-git7/drivers/net/orig.pcnet32.c 2007-10-15 11:19:17.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23-git7/drivers/net/pcnet32.c 2007-10-17 15:56:15.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1849,6 +1849,9 @@ pcnet32_probe1(unsigned long ioaddr, int
> lp->mii_if.mdio_read = mdio_read;
> lp->mii_if.mdio_write = mdio_write;
>
> + /* napi.weight is used in both the napi and non-napi cases */
> + lp->napi.weight = lp->rx_ring_size / 2;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCNET32_NAPI
> netif_napi_add(dev, &lp->napi, pcnet32_poll, lp->rx_ring_size / 2);
> #endif
In general, we're hoping to remove as many CONFIG_FOO_NAPI as possible,
pushing everybody towards using NAPI.
Any objection to heading in this direction with pcnet32?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists