netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:52:02 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi
	poll

net: Add __napi_synchronize() to sync with napi poll

The EMAC driver which needs to handle multiple devices with one
NAPI instance implements its own per-channel disable bit. However,
when setting such a bit, it needs to synchronize with the poller
(that is make sure that any pending poller instance has completed,
or is started late enough to see that disable bit).

This implements a low level __napi_synchronize() function to acheive
that. The underscores are to emphasis the low level aspect of it and
to discourage driver writers who don't know what they are doing to
use it (to please DaveM :-)

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
---

Switched to do a cpu_relax() spin instead and only on SMP. Not that
we have an smp_mb() in there which synchronize_irq() lacks. I believe
this is a bug in synchronize_irq() which I'll handle separately.

Note: unfortunately, Jeff already picked up the EMAC patch without
waiting for this to be sorted out (oops...). So if you agree with
this patch, it would be nice to have it go in quickly or maybe via
Jeff's tree to avoid breakage ? Not terribly important tho.

Index: linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h
===================================================================
--- linux-work.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 12:39:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 12:40:59.000000000 +1000
@@ -394,6 +394,23 @@ static inline void napi_disable(struct n
 }

 /**
+ *	__napi_synchronize - synchronize with a concurrent poll
+ *	@n: napi context
+ *
+ * Synchronizes with a concurrent poll. Not to be used in normal
+ * drivers, mostly useful if you end up with multiple interfaces
+ * on one NAPI instance.
+ */
+static inline void __napi_synchronize(struct napi_struct *n)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	smp_mb();
+	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
+		cpu_relax();
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+}
+
+/**
  *	napi_enable - enable NAPI scheduling
  *	@n: napi context
  *

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html