[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017145315.GC5744@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:53:15 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Michael Wu <flamingice@...rmilk.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'fixes-davem' branch of wireless-2.6
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:29:51PM -0400, Michael Wu wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 22:31:46 John W. Linville wrote:
> > Bill Moss (1):
> > mac80211: honor IW_SCAN_THIS_ESSID in siwscan ioctl
> >
> Where did this patch come from? The original patch looked nothing like this,
> and this patch changes the behavior of siwscan incorrectly. If the interface
"Nothing like this"? I moved a conditional from inside a specific
case to outside the whole switch. Let's not overstate things.
> is not STA, IBSS, or AP, scanning should not be permitted. This patch allows
> scanning on any interface if a SSID is specified. NACK.
I refactored the patch in response to Johannes' email on 10/11 that
said "I think it should be done regardless of mode".
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=119209214914682&w=2
I seem to have botched the repost -- sorry about that.
Looking closer, it does seem like ieee80211_sta_req_scan may not be
robust enough to handle an inappropriate interface gracefully. So,
let's add a patch that relocates the conditional after the switch,
and let the switch filter-out the bad interfaces for us.
Patch to follow (if I've figured-out git-send-email)...
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@...driver.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists