[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071018083030.05a2aade@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:30:30 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip: justification for local port range robustness
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:27:37 +0200
Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is a justifying patch for Stephen's patches. Stephen's patches
> disallows using a port range of one single port and brakes the meaning
> of the 'remaining' variable, in some places it has different meaning.
> My patch gives back the sense of 'remaining' variable. It should mean how
> many ports are remaining and nothing else. Also my patch allows using
> a single port.
>
> I sure we must be able to use mentioned port range, this does not
> restricted by documentation and does not brake current behavior.
>
> usefull links:
> Patches posted by Stephen Hemminger
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119206106218187&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119206109918235&w=2
>
> Andrew Morton's comment
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119248225007737&w=2
>
> == Patch:
>
> Justification of the Stephen Hemminger's patches, commit numbers
> 06393009000779b00a558fd2f280882cc7dc2008
> 227b60f5102cda4e4ab792b526a59c8cb20cd9f8
>
> 1. Allows using a port range of one single port.
> 2. Gives back sense of 'remaining' variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists