lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:02:03 -0500
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 08:04 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> net: Add __napi_synchronize() to sync with napi poll
> 
> The EMAC driver which needs to handle multiple devices with one
> NAPI instance implements its own per-channel disable bit. However,
> when setting such a bit, it needs to synchronize with the poller
> (that is make sure that any pending poller instance has completed,
> or is started late enough to see that disable bit).
> 
> This implements a low level __napi_synchronize() function to acheive
> that. The underscores are to emphasis the low level aspect of it and
> to discourage driver writers who don't know what they are doing to
> use it (to please DaveM :-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>

Ok, trying again, leaving the actual patch below.  In the above patch
description, you still call it __napi_synchronize.  In the patch below,
it's napi_syncronize.

I was just trying to point out to whomever commits this patch that the
actual description should probably be fixed.

> ---
> 
> Back to msleep() since it fits my need well and that's what
> you used as well. Note that the smp_mb() will turn into barrier()
> on non-SMP.
> 
> I'll send a separate patch to fix EMAC to use the non __ version.
> 
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 13:31:32.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-18 08:01:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -394,6 +394,23 @@ static inline void napi_disable(struct n
>  }
> 
>  /**
> + *	napi_synchronize - synchronize with a concurrent poll
> + *	@n: napi context
> + *
> + * Synchronizes with a concurrent poll. Not to be used in normal
> + * drivers, mostly useful if you end up with multiple interfaces
> + * on one NAPI instance. This must be called from task context.
> + */
> +static inline void napi_synchronize(struct napi_struct *n)
> +{
> +	smp_mb();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
> +		msleep(1);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   *	napi_enable - enable NAPI scheduling
>   *	@n: napi context
>   *
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ