[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26556.1192855654@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:47:34 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:40:02 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> Sure, the idea was to mark the filter table obsolete as to make people start
> using the mangle table to do their filtering for new setups. The filter
> table would then still be available for legacy/special setups. But this
> would only be possible if we at least ported the REJECT target to mangle.
That's *half* the battle. The other half is explaining why I should move
from a perfectly functional setup that uses the filter table. What gains
do I get from doing so? What isn't working that I don't know about? etc?
In other words - why do I want to move from filter to mangle?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists