[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <471C9F79.4030407@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:02:49 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 1/5] Cut off br_port fied from net_device
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 04:33:33PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> And add the forward declaration for br_handle_frame_hook in
>> include/linux/if_bridge.h
>
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -699,8 +699,10 @@ struct net_device
>> /* Network namespace this network device is inside */
>> struct net *nd_net;
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_BRIDGE) || defined(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MODULE)
>> /* bridge stuff */
>> struct net_bridge_port *br_port;
>> +#endif
>
> Such ifdefs are troublesome, because one can compile kernel with
> CONFIG_BRIDGE=n and later decide he needs BRIDGE=m and go boom.
You will have to recompile the whole kernel when this config
is on. Look at netif_receive_skb() ;)
> IPv6 -- the biggest violator of this rule should not be taken as
> example. :^)
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists