lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:11:47 +0900 (JST) From: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@...t.go.jp> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, davem@...emloft.net, y-kodama@...t.go.jp Subject: [PATCH net-2.6] [TCP]: fix D-SACK cwnd handling In the current net-2.6 kernel, handling FLAG_DSACKING_ACK is broken. The flag is cleared to 1 just after FLAG_DSACKING_ACK is set. if (found_dup_sack) flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK; : flag = 1; To fix it, this patch introduces a part of the tcp_sacktag_state patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=119210560431519&w=2 Do you plan to apply the tcp_sacktag_state patch? Or please apply this patch. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> Signed-off-by: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@...t.go.jp> --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 +++++------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 3dbbb44..59e3c9a 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ int cached_fack_count; int i; int first_sack_index; + int force_one_sack; if (!tp->sacked_out) { if (WARN_ON(tp->fackets_out)) @@ -1272,18 +1273,18 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ * if the only SACK change is the increase of the end_seq of * the first block then only apply that SACK block * and use retrans queue hinting otherwise slowpath */ - flag = 1; + force_one_sack = 1; for (i = 0; i < num_sacks; i++) { __be32 start_seq = sp[i].start_seq; __be32 end_seq = sp[i].end_seq; if (i == 0) { if (tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq != start_seq) - flag = 0; + force_one_sack = 0; } else { if ((tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq != start_seq) || (tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq != end_seq)) - flag = 0; + force_one_sack = 0; } tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq = start_seq; tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq = end_seq; @@ -1295,7 +1296,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ } first_sack_index = 0; - if (flag) + if (force_one_sack) num_sacks = 1; else { int j; @@ -1321,9 +1322,6 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ } } - /* clear flag as used for different purpose in following code */ - flag = 0; - /* Use SACK fastpath hint if valid */ cached_skb = tp->fastpath_skb_hint; cached_fack_count = tp->fastpath_cnt_hint; -- 1.5.3.4 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists