[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710251806.07958.nakam@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:06:07 +0900
From: Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3][XFRM]: Support packet processing error statistics.
Wednesday 24 October 2007 21:18, jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-24-10 at 12:30 +0900, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote:
>
> > At IPsec point of view, actually "SPI mismatch" caused by user configuration
> > cannot be identified easily since identify of SAD is consist of SPI, address and
> > protocol(ESP/AH...) and linux SAD uses hash database. It is database identify
> > mismatch. Then, SPI mismatch goes "NoStates" at my patch.
> > OTOH Key mismatch goes "ProtoError" since esp[46]_input returns error.
>
> Would be useful to just document what you said above so that user doesnt
> have to intepret it.
OK, I write it to commit-log then. If anybody have another place
where such information should be written, tell me.
[snip]
> > > In any case, it seems to me to be more accurate to not call them MIB
> > > stats if they are not. This doesnt qualify using the macros, utilities
> > > etc used for MIBs.
> >
>
> BTW, I meant "doesnt disqualify them" above;->
OK ;-)
Jamal, thanks for many comments.
--
Masahide NAKAMURA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists