[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4720B909.7000108@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:40:57 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: panther@...abit.hu
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IFGROUPv4 2/3] Interface group: core (netlink) part
Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> Patrick McHardy írta:
>> Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
>>> Interface groups let handle different interfaces together
>>> especially in netfilter modules.
>>> Modified net device structure and netlink interface.
>>>
>>> @@ -891,6 +895,13 @@ static int do_setlink(struct net_device *dev,
>>> struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (tb[IFLA_IFGROUP]) {
>>> + write_lock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
>>> + dev->ifgroup = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_IFGROUP]);
>>> + write_unlock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
>>> + modified = 1;
>>> + }
>>
>>
>> The locking looks unnecessary, the rtnl should be enough.
>> I'm not even sure why its used for operstate and linkmode,
>> AFAICS they are also protected by the rtnl.
>>
>
> Hm, ok. In this case operstate and linkmode can be unprotected as code
> cleanup, am I right? Or leave them unchanged?
There seems to be a single case where operstate is used without
the rtnl (under dev_base_lock), in dev_get_flags() invoked by
dev_ifsioc_locked(). But that looks like a bug, there are many
callers of dev_change_flags() that only take the rtnl. So this
would be more a fix than a cleanup.
> And notification is only needed if something was changed.
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists