netdev - Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	dlunev@...il.com, benjamin.thery@...l.net, xemul@...nvz.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, clg@...ibm.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	dlezcano@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with
 CONFIG_NET_NS=n

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:21:55 -0600

> > By the way, I think that we can in the case of undefined CONFIG_NET_NS
> > reduce register to calling ->init method and unregister to calling
> > ->exit method.
> >
> > This is a correct thing at least for now and will be welcomed by the all
> > embedded/etc people.
> 
> I'm not fundamentally opposed.  Earlier versions of my patchset
> did that and more.   However I think the pain is greater then the
> gain right now.  Especially since this concept seem to require
> having quality inspected into it.

I think the correct thing to do for now is to simply remove these
__net_* markers and their definitions.  There are so many tricky cases
that it is easier to just get rid of them.

Could someone send me a patch which does that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html