lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:31:55 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: ebiederm@...ssion.com Cc: dlunev@...il.com, benjamin.thery@...l.net, xemul@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, clg@...ibm.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org, dlezcano@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:21:55 -0600 > > By the way, I think that we can in the case of undefined CONFIG_NET_NS > > reduce register to calling ->init method and unregister to calling > > ->exit method. > > > > This is a correct thing at least for now and will be welcomed by the all > > embedded/etc people. > > I'm not fundamentally opposed. Earlier versions of my patchset > did that and more. However I think the pain is greater then the > gain right now. Especially since this concept seem to require > having quality inspected into it. I think the correct thing to do for now is to simply remove these __net_* markers and their definitions. There are so many tricky cases that it is easier to just get rid of them. Could someone send me a patch which does that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists