[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071030.144627.56281140.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ak@...e.de
Cc: jdelvare@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Saner thash_entries default with much memory
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:42:05 +0100
> I still have my doubts it makes sense to have an own lock for each bucket. It
> would be probably better to just divide the hash value through a factor
> again and then use that to index a smaller lock only table.
Yes, and that's why we do it this way in the routing cache hashes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists