[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071031080849.GE5059@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:08:49 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix networking scatterlist regressions.
On Wed, Oct 31 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:01:43 +0100
>
> > On Wed, Oct 31 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:46:21 +0100
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 30 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ decryptor(struct scatterlist *sg, void *data)
> > > > > if (thislen == 0)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > - sg_mark_end(desc->frags, desc->fragno);
> > > > > + __sg_mark_end(desc->frags, desc->fragno);
> > > > >
> > > > > ret = crypto_blkcipher_decrypt_iv(&desc->desc, desc->frags,
> > > > > desc->frags, thislen);
> > > >
> > > > Hmm? These don't seem right. It also has a weird code sequence:
> > > ...
> > > > Did something go wrong there?
> > >
> > > Yes, I fixed those up after doing some allmodconfig builds.
> > >
> > > Here is the final patch I actually pushed to Linus:
> >
> > That fixes up the sg_mark_end() bit, but it's still calling
> > sg_init_table() just a few lines further down. Is that correct?
>
> Absolutely. It initially using the scatterlist for this
> crypto layer call:
>
> ret = crypto_blkcipher_decrypt_iv(&desc->desc, desc->frags,
> desc->frags, thislen);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> then it reinits and sets the sglist to the values the caller
> wants.
Great, just wanted to double check that it was indeed correct!
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists