netdev - Re: Oops in 2.6.21-rc4, 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071031083915.GA1814@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:39:15 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	darko.koruga@...l.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops in 2.6.21-rc4, 2.6.23

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:41:47AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> ...
> > Actually, this was caused by a real bug in the SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD macro
> > definition, which Herbert Xu quickly spotted and fixed.
> > 
> > Which "I hope you've found this by yourself by now".
> > 
> 
> ...Btw, of course you have to be right, and I should find this in max.
> 12 days yet, if I'm as smart as I hope. But as for now, I really can't
> see any meaningful difference between this "buggy" SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD
> version and 'generic' 2.6.20.

OK. At last I've found "by myself", what you seemed to suggest with
such a great subtlety... So, there was this another, bugzilla thread...
And, accidentally of course, I could have been not so 100% wrong, as
expected?!

Regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html