netdev - Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <472A6089.7020104@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:26:01 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	djohnson+linux-kernel@...starentnetworks.com,
	greearb@...delatech.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bguo@...starentnetworks.com
Subject: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?

David Miller wrote:
> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
>>I'll try to go pester folks in tcpdump-workers then.
> 
> 
> The thing to check is "TP_STATUS_CSUMNOTREADY".
> 
> When using mmap(), it will be provided in the descriptor.  When using
> recvmsg() it will be provided via a PACKET_AUXDATA control message
> when enabled via the PACKET_AUXDATA socket option.

Figures... the "dailies" and "weeklies" for tar files of tcpdump and libpcap 
source are fubar... again.  I've email in to tcpdump-workers on that one.  If 
that isn't resolved quickly I'll learn how to access their CVS (pick an SCM, any 
SCM...)

I did an apt-get of debian lenny's tcpdump and sources:

hpcpc103:~# tcpdump -V
tcpdump version 3.9.8
libpcap version 0.9.8

and that seems to show the false checksum failure and not use the 
TP_STATUS_CSUMNOTREADY - at least that didn't appear in a grepping of the 
sources.  At first I thought it might be, but then I realized that my snaplen 
was too short to get the whole TSO'ed frame so tcpdump wasn't even trying to 
verify.  After disabling TSO on the NIC, leaving CKO on, and making my snaplen > 
1500 I could see it was doing undesirable stuff.

I'll see what top of trunk has at some point and what the folks there think of 
adding-in a change.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html