netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071101.000238.239270625.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, xemul@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:58:59 +0100

> I agree with you that with current state, this atomic_inc/atomic_dec_and_test 
> wont come in profiles unless a trivial bench is writen
> 
> for(;;){close(socket(....));}

Just add one packet send and one packet receive in there and you have
a transaction workload.  It's really not that unrealistic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html