[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071101.040340.60088560.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash
table
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:16:20 +0100
> As done two years ago on IP route cache table (commit
> 22c047ccbc68fa8f3fa57f0e8f906479a062c426) , we can avoid using one lock per
> hash bucket for the huge TCP/DCCP hash tables.
>
> On a typical x86_64 platform, this saves about 2MB or 4MB of ram, for litle
> performance differences. (we hit a different cache line for the rwlock, but
> then the bucket cache line have a better sharing factor among cpus, since we
> dirty it less often)
>
> Using a 'small' table of hashed rwlocks should be more than enough to provide
> correct SMP concurrency between different buckets, without using too much
> memory. Sizing of this table depends on NR_CPUS and various CONFIG settings.
>
> This patch provides some locking abstraction that may ease a future work using
> a different model for TCP/DCCP table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Nice work Eric.
I've tossed this into my local tree and we'll let this cook
for a few days. If no problems crop up I will submit it
for 2.6.24 because the memory savings is non-trivial.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists