netdev - Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 4 Nov 2007 01:54:33 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash table

> > Also the EHASH_LOCK_SZ == 0 special case is a little strange. Why did
> > you add that?
> 
> He explained this in another reply, because ifdefs are ugly.

I meant why having it at all? 

> Any use that makes 
> "sense" is a case where the code should be rewritten to decrease the
> lock hold time or convert to RCU.

I don't think RCU would be really needed for single entry buckets (which
are common) if they are special cased. After all it would be just
a single pointer. Perhaps one could distingush this case e.g. by 
setting the low order bit of the hash bucket pointer.

In fact to optimize for this case it might be an interesting
experiment to go towards an closed hash table and allocate the sockets
in page sized objects and then remap them directly into a virtual
continuous table similar to the new vmemmap code (need to try this at some 
point). 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html