netdev - Re: [PATCH][PACKET] Remove unneeded packet_socks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4731E4CE.6030603@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:16:14 +0300
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PACKET] Remove unneeded packet_socks_nr variable

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:50:04PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:32:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
>>> This one is used only under ifdef PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG in
>>> printk and is not needed otherwise. So hide all this stuff
>>> under the PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
>> Look at sk_refcnt_debug_inc, etc and you'll se a more standard way. I
>> forgot to make this when making all protocol families use sk_prot, even
>> if just partially :-)
> 
> As a bonus you'll get this information on /proc/net/protocols, removing
> '-1' from PACKET column for "sockets".

Hm... I actually thought about this, but I decided that packet
sockets were not accounted in this way deliberately.

So, shall I break this "compatibility" (-1 in proc) and provide
a packet socket number in this file?

> - Arnaldo

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html