[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711071717.43429.netdev@axxeo.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:17:42 +0100
From: Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] [IPSEC]: Move x->outer_mode->output out of locked section
Hi Herbert,
Herbert Xu schrieb:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_mode_ro.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_mode_ro.c
> index a7bc8c6..4a01cb3 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_mode_ro.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_mode_ro.c
> @@ -53,7 +54,9 @@ static int xfrm6_ro_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> __skb_pull(skb, hdr_len);
> memmove(ipv6_hdr(skb), iph, hdr_len);
>
> + spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
> x->lastused = get_seconds();
> + spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
Can you move the retrieval of the seconds outside the spinlock?
e.g.
tmp = get_seconds();
spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
x->lastused = tmp;
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
or is it not really worth it?
Best Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists