netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:12:14 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	netdev@...eo.de
Cc:	Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support

Hello.

In article <200711071658.59478.netdev@...eo.de> (at Wed, 7 Nov 2007 16:58:59 +0100), Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de> says:

> > +	eui[0] = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* Check for RFC3330 global address ranges */
> > +	if (((ipv4 >= 0x01000000) && (ipv4 < 0x0a000000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0x0b000000) && (ipv4 < 0x7f000000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0x80000000) && (ipv4 < 0xa9fe0000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0xa9ff0000) && (ipv4 < 0xac100000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0xac200000) && (ipv4 < 0xc0a80000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0xc0a90000) && (ipv4 < 0xc6120000)) ||
> > +	    ((ipv4 >= 0xc6140000) && (ipv4 < 0xe0000000))) eui[0] |=
> > 0x2;
> > +
> 
> Instead of converting network to host byte order at runtime 
> and comparing the results to constants, let the compiler convert
> the constants to network byte order and compare in network order.
> 
> so use:
> 
>  if (((*addr >= htonl(0x01000000)) && (*addr < htonl(0x0a000000))) || ....
> 
> instead. The compiler will notice that "0x01000000" is a constant and will
> use "_constant_htonl()" automatically.

No, you cannot do this.
When you check the "range", you need to use host-byte order.

> > +
> > +static inline int ipv6_addr_is_isatap(const struct in6_addr *addr)
> > +{
> > +       return (addr->s6_addr32[2] == __constant_htonl(0x02005EFE) ||
> > +               addr->s6_addr32[2] == __constant_htonl(0x00005EFE));
> > +}
> > +#endif
> 
> The compiler will notice that "0x01000000" is a constant and will
> use "_constant_htonl()" automatically. Please use simply htonl().

Right.  And, maybe, you can write as follows:
	return ((addr->s6_addr32[2] | htonl(0x02000000)) == htonl(0x02005EFE));

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html