netdev - Re: [PATCH] using mii-bitbang on different processor ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:40:44 +0100
From:	Sergej Stepanov <Sergej.Stepanov@....de>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] using mii-bitbang on different processor ports -
	update the booting-without-of.txt-file

Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2007, 12:46 -0600 schrieb Scott Wood:
> >  
> > +   The "reg"-property may have also depending on board design
> > +   the following form:
> > +	reg = <10d40 14 10d60 14>;
> > +   In that case the pin for mdio data controlling is on the port C,
> > +   and the pin for mdio clock controlling is on the port D.
> 
> It'd be better to explicitly say that the first resource is mdio, and the
> second resource is mdc, rather than require the reader to know/look up which
> corresponds to 10d40 and which to 10d60.
> 
> -Scott

Ok. What would you say about something like that:
--
If both mdio and mdc controlling pins are on the same processor port,
one resource should be used.
Otherwise, two resources are used: the 1-st - mdio, the 2-nd - mdc.
--
Please, correct me, if it sounds bad.

Thanks and regards
Sergej. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html