netdev - Re: 2.6.24-rc1-gb4f5550 oops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:49:18 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@....co.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-gb4f5550 oops

On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100
> > > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > I got this oops on 2.6.24-rc1-641-gb4f5550:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (1) Is this reproducible?
> > > > > > (2) Did it happen previously on your system?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000120 RIP: 
> > > > > > [18073.371134]  [<ffffffff8023572e>] check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e/0x110
> > > > > 
> > > > > This has now happened twice - the second time was last night when
> > > > > running 2.6.24-rc2.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here's that second occurrence:
> > > > > 
> > > [snip]
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm.
> > > > 
> > > > Please run "gdb vmlinux" and see what code corresponds to
> > > > check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e in your kernel.
> > >
> > > 
> > > Dump of assembler code for function check_preempt_wakeup:
> > 
> > Well, thanks, but I meant the source code.  Please do "gdb vmlinux" and then
> > "l *check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e" in gdb.
> 
> Here's the requested output:
> 
> (gdb) l *check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e
> 0xffffffff802329ae is in check_preempt_wakeup (kernel/sched_fair.c:668).
> 663
> 664     /* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */
> 665     static inline int
> 666     is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
> 667     {
> 668             if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq)
> 669                     return 1;
> 670
> 671             return 0;
> 672     }

Well, it looks like either se or pse is NULL.

Ingo, can you please have a look?

Thanks,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html