netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix infinite loop on dev_mc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071109192033.GB22714@pogo>
Date:	Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:21:54 -0500
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix infinite loop on dev_mc_unsync()

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:07:16AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:51 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > While reviewing net/core/dev_mcast.c I found what I think is an 
> > infinite loop on dev_mc_unsync(). This fixes it. We make use of
> > this guy on mac80211 in ieee80211_stop(). This is untested.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...lab.rutgers.edu>
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev_mcast.c b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
> > index 15241cf..5373c03 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev_mcast.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
> > @@ -168,8 +168,10 @@ void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
> >  	da = from->mc_list;
> >  	while (da != NULL) {
> >  		next = da->next;
> > -		if (!da->da_synced)
> > +		if (!da->da_synced) {
> > +			da = next;
> >  			continue;
> > +		}
> >  		__dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
> >  				  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
> >  		da->da_synced = 0;
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> Perhaps this is clearer as:
> 
> void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
> {
> 	struct dev_addr_list *da;
> 
> 	netif_tx_lock_bh(from);
> 	netif_tx_lock_bh(to);
> 
> 	da = from->mc_list;
> 	while (da) {
> 		if (da->da_synced) {
> 			__dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
> 					  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
> 			__dev_addr_delete(&from->mc_list, &from->mc_count,
> 					  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
> 			da->da_synced = 0;
> 		}
> 		da = da->next;
> 	}
> 
> 	__dev_set_rx_mode(to);
> 
> 	netif_tx_unlock_bh(to);
> 	netif_tx_unlock_bh(from);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_unsync);

Sure, or better with a for loop and do away with next pointer then:

void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
{
        struct dev_addr_list *da;

        netif_tx_lock_bh(from);
        netif_tx_lock_bh(to);

        for (da = from->mc_list; da; da = da->next) {
                if (!da->da_synced)
                        continue;
                __dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
                                  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
                da->da_synced = 0;
                __dev_addr_delete(&from->mc_list, &from->mc_count,
                                  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
        }
        __dev_set_rx_mode(to);

        netif_tx_unlock_bh(to);
        netif_tx_unlock_bh(from);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_unsync);

Patch below.

Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...lab.rutgers.edu>

diff --git a/net/core/dev_mcast.c b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
index 15241cf..2aea8e1 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_mcast.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
@@ -160,14 +160,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_sync);
  */
 void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
 {
-	struct dev_addr_list *da, *next;
+	struct dev_addr_list *da;
 
 	netif_tx_lock_bh(from);
 	netif_tx_lock_bh(to);
 
-	da = from->mc_list;
-	while (da != NULL) {
-		next = da->next;
+	for (da = from->mc_list; da; da = da->next) {
 		if (!da->da_synced)
 			continue;
 		__dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
@@ -175,7 +173,6 @@ void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
 		da->da_synced = 0;
 		__dev_addr_delete(&from->mc_list, &from->mc_count,
 				  da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
-		da = next;
 	}
 	__dev_set_rx_mode(to);
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html