[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1194653320.19522.28.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:08:40 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix infinite loop on dev_mc_unsync()
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:12 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> This may cause a use-after-free since __dev_addr_delete frees the address
> when all references are gone.
How about a comment then? Perhaps:
diff --git a/net/core/dev_mcast.c b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
index ae35405..63576aa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_mcast.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
@@ -165,16 +165,23 @@ void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
netif_tx_lock_bh(from);
netif_tx_lock_bh(to);
+ /*
+ This while loop can't be written as
+ for (da = from->mc_list; da; da = da->next)
+ da = from->mc_list and __dev_addr_delete can kfree(from->mc_list)
+ which could cause a use-after-free of da->next
+ */
+
da = from->mc_list;
while (da != NULL) {
next = da->next;
- if (!da->da_synced)
- continue;
- __dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
- da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
- da->da_synced = 0;
- __dev_addr_delete(&from->mc_list, &from->mc_count,
- da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
+ if (da->da_synced) {
+ __dev_addr_delete(&to->mc_list, &to->mc_count,
+ da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
+ da->da_synced = 0;
+ __dev_addr_delete(&from->mc_list, &from->mc_count,
+ da->da_addr, da->da_addrlen, 0);
+ }
da = next;
}
__dev_set_rx_mode(to);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists