lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:42:34 +0100
From:	"Antoine Zen-Ruffinen" <antoine.zen@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	patrik.arlos@....se
Subject: Problem with frame time stamping

Dear all,

I'm writing a network analyzer software using Linux and I need a VERY
precise frame time stamping. Therefor I am planing to add my own time
stamping algorithm on a modified network driver. For test purpose I
did so :

	skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0x00010002;
	netif_rx(skb);

On the user side, I ask for the timestamp that way :

	...
	sock = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, type);
	...
	//bind this socket with the interface using my modified driver.
	...
	recvByteCount = recv(sock, buffer, 1514, 0);
    	ioctl(sock, SIOCGSTAMP, &timeStamp);

I was surprised to see that the var timeStamp was still holding a
count of second since  year 1970.

Investigating a bit into the kernel code, I found that ioctl(sock,
SIOCGSTAMP, ...) was giving just the current kernel time using
ktime_get_real().

Are my investigation wrong ?
Is that a bug in kernel code ?
Is there an other way to access skb.tstamp from user side ?

Thank's to any one that can help me !

Antoine Zen-Ruffinen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists