netdev - Re: [Resend][PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4738CF78.6030804@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:11:04 -0500
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To:	"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4)

Hi Fred

First, are you breaking up the functionality into multiple
patches _only_ to ease review and plan to submit the final
version as a big patch?

The reason I ask, is that you Patch 02, which adds Kconfig
pieces could break compilations if the functionality is
enabled.


Templin, Fred L wrote:
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: osprey67 [mailto:osprey67@...oo.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:54 AM
> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4)
> 
> From: Fred L. Templin <fred.l.templin@...ing.com>
> 
> This is experimental support for the Intra-Site Automatic
> Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) per RFC4214. It uses
> the SIT module, and is configured using the unmodified
> "ip" utility with device names beginning with: "isatap".
> 
> The following diffs are specific to the Linux 2.6.24-rc2
> kernel distribution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fred L. Templin <fred.l.templin@...ing.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/if.h.orig    2007-11-08
> 12:05:47.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/if.h 2007-11-08 08:26:44.000000000
> -0800
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>   #define IFF_MASTER_ALB 0x10            /* bonding master, balance-alb.
> */
>   #define IFF_BONDING    0x20            /* bonding master or slave
> */
>   #define IFF_SLAVE_NEEDARP 0x40         /* need ARPs for validation
> */
> +#define IFF_ISATAP     0x80            /* ISATAP interface (RFC4214)
> */
> 
>   #define IF_GET_IFACE   0x0001          /* for querying only */
>   #define IF_GET_PROTO   0x0002
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/in.h.orig    2007-11-09
> 08:00:32.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/in.h 2007-11-12 07:37:05.000000000
> -0800
> @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ struct sockaddr_in {
>   #define ZERONET(x)     (((x) & htonl(0xff000000)) ==
> htonl(0x00000000))
>   #define LOCAL_MCAST(x) (((x) & htonl(0xFFFFFF00)) ==
> htonl(0xE0000000))
> 
> +/* Special-Use IPv4 Addresses (RFC3330) */
> +#define PRIVATE_10(x)  (((x) & htonl(0xff000000)) == htonl(0x0A000000))
> +#define LINKLOCAL_169(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffff0000)) ==
> htonl(0xA9FE0000))
> +#define PRIVATE_172(x) (((x) & htonl(0xfff00000)) == htonl(0xAC100000))
> +#define TEST_192(x)    (((x) & htonl(0xffffff00)) == htonl(0xC0000200))
> +#define ANYCAST_6TO4(x)        (((x) & htonl(0xffffff00)) ==
> htonl(0xC0586300))
> +#define PRIVATE_192(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffff0000)) == htonl(0xC0A80000))
> +#define TEST_198(x)    (((x) & htonl(0xfffe0000)) == htonl(0xC6120000))
>   #endif
> 
>   #endif /* _LINUX_IN_H */
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/addrconf.h.orig        2007-11-08
> 12:06:17.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/addrconf.h     2007-11-09
> 08:12:29.000000000 -0800
> @@ -241,6 +241,14 @@ static inline int ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_ro
>                  addr->s6_addr32[3] == htonl(0x00000002));
>   }
> 
> +#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6_ISATAP)
> +/* only for IFF_ISATAP interfaces */
> +static inline int ipv6_addr_is_isatap(const struct in6_addr *addr)
> +{
> +       return ((addr->s6_addr32[2] | htonl(0x02000000)) ==
> htonl(0x02005EFE));
> +}
> +#endif
> +

I don't see the need for the # if above.

-vlad

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html