[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071113232954.GK1356@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:29:54 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
protasnb@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> >...
> > There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the
> > classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one
> > of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM
> > community looks for ARM bugs in bugzilla.
> >
> > Let's not forget that it would be a waste of time for people to manually
> > check bugzilla for ARM bugs. There's soo few people reporting ARM bugs
> > into bugzilla that a weekly manual check by every maintainer would just
> > return the same old boring results for months and months at a time.
> >...
>
> What about having all ARM bugs in Bugzilla by default assigned to
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk? [1]
That would also work, probably much better than setting up yet another
list.
My experience of trying to get mbligh to do this when I stopped looking
after PCMCIA stuff was *extremely* painful. Wonder if it's become any
easier of late?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists