netdev - Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071113034916.2556edd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	protasnb@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:39:46 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:53 -0800
> 
> > > NETWORKING===========================================================
> > > 
> > > RTNLGRP_ND_USEROPT does not report ifindex (IPv6)
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349
> > > Kernel: 2.6.24+
> > 
> > No response from developers
> 
> That's funny, then how come there was a proper patch fix posted
> and it's now in my tree ready to go to Linus?
> 
> I think you like just saying "No response from developers" over and
> over again to make some of point about how developers are ignoring
> lots of bugs.  That's fine, but at least be accurate about it :-)

Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html