[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <473A8F14.7050703@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:00:52 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPV4: add raw drops counter
Wang Chen a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet said the following on 2007-11-13 19:11:
>> Wang Chen a écrit :
>>> Add raw drops counter for IPv4 in /proc/net/raw .
>>>
>>> + atomic_t sk_drops;
>>>
>> This doesnt need an atomic_t , just an 'unsigned int' is OK, since
>> sock_queue_rcv_skb() is called on a locked socket.
>>
>
> Yes, sock_queue_rcv_skb() is called on a locked socket. But sk_drops
> will not only used with sock_queue_rcv_skb(), but also with
> xfrm4_policy_check(), skb_checksum_complete(), skb_kill_datagram(),etc.
> So, atomic_t ensure sk_drops will be atomic increment.
>
>> Also, I suggest doing the sk_drops increment in sock_queue_rcv_skb() so
>> that it can be used for other sockets as well ?
>>
>
> As I described before, sk_drops will be used on different conditions,
> on which the raw drop happens.
> So doing sk_drops increment in upper caller is better than in
> sock_queue_rcv_skb().
>
> Thank you for your suggestion, I will make a new patch to add sk_drops
> increment in other places.
>
Thank you for clarifications, I was not aware upcoming patches were planed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists