[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1mytg24y6.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:59:45 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, wensong@...ux-vs.org, ja@....bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Fix sysctl warnings about missing strategy
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> writes:
>
> Hi Christian, Hi Dave,
>
> I have indeed been looking into this of late. Assuming that you use of
> CTL_UNNUMBERED is correct, this patch looks fine to me. Acked.
>
> I was planning to do the same and also switch over all the other entries
> over to use CTL_UNNUMBERED, as its hard to imagine that anyone is using
> the sys_sysctl interface to IPVS.
>
> As for the commented out entries. They are supposed to be exposed by
> some other means - I believe the thinking was to comply with the don't
> expose stuff in proc any more idea. Where is the best place to expose
> this kind of stuff?
>
> Lastly, as Dave mentions, I'm travelling this week, so please
> excuse any slowness.
Looking at this patch it looks sane enough. Either removing ctl_name
or explicitly using CTL_UNNUMBERED is fine. It may be wise to leave
the binary entries in ip_vs.h and sysctl_check.c as documentation,
but even there it doesn't much matter since we don't plan on adding more.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists