[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115.155509.107545186.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:55:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: johnpol@....mipt.ru
Cc: cebbert@...hat.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Null pointer dereference in nf_nat_move_storage(), kernel
2.6.23.1
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:06:59 +0300
> Please test attached patch.
>
> This routing is called each time hash should be replaced, nf_conn has
> extension list which contains pointers to connection tracking users
> (like nat, which is right now the only such user), so when replace takes
> place it should copy own extensions. Loop above checks for own
> extension, but tries to move higer-layer one, which can lead to above
> oops.
>
> Not tested, derived from code observation only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
It looks extremely correct to me. Therefore I'm going to apply
this and queue it up for -stable.
Thanks Evgeniy, keep up the excellent work!
Patrick, please let me know if you have any objections.
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> index a1a65a1..cf6ba66 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void *__nf_ct_ext_add(struct nf_conn *ct, enum nf_ct_ext_id id, gfp_t gfp)
> rcu_read_lock();
> t = rcu_dereference(nf_ct_ext_types[i]);
> if (t && t->move)
> - t->move(ct, ct->ext + ct->ext->offset[id]);
> + t->move(ct, ct->ext + ct->ext->offset[i]);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> kfree(ct->ext);
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists