[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115.025803.22981639.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:58:03 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: xemul@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][INET] (resend) Fix potential kfree on vmalloc-ed
area of request_sock_queue
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:21:01 +0100
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:41:37 +0300
> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
>
> > The request_sock_queue's listen_opt is either vmalloc-ed or
> > kmalloc-ed depending on the number of table entries. Thus it
> > is expected to be handled properly on free, which is done in
> > the reqsk_queue_destroy().
> >
> > However the error path in inet_csk_listen_start() calls
> > the lite version of reqsk_queue_destroy, called
> > __reqsk_queue_destroy, which calls the kfree unconditionally.
> >
> > Fix this and move the __reqsk_queue_destroy into a .c file as
> > it looks too big to be inline.
> >
> > As David also noticed, this is an error recovery path only,
> > so no locking is required and the lopt is known to be not NULL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> >
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>
> Thank you for finding this bug Pavel
Indeed.
I applied this, but what I did was I combined both changes
into one because to me they logically belong together.
Thanks again Pavel!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists