[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11951338543953-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:26 +0200
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] [TCP]: Extend reordering detection to cover CA_Loss partially
This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
overall comment:
"Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
we cannot account for retransmits accurately."
When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that
undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found,
thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells
that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state
of TCP.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index c470b5a..48c059d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
- if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss &&
+ if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) &&
+ ((icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss) || tp->undo_marker) &&
(!tp->frto_highmark || after(tp->snd_una, tp->frto_highmark)))
tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - reord, 0);
--
1.5.0.6
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists