[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071115.193527.149970561.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:35:27 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] [TCP]: Extend reordering detection to cover
CA_Loss partially
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:26 +0200
> This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
> overall comment:
>
> "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
> we cannot account for retransmits accurately."
>
> When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that
> undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found,
> thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells
> that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state
> of TCP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Applied to net-2.6.25, thanks!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists