netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <m3hcjm6s42.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:02:37 +0100
From:	Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

>>>>> "DM" == David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

DM> When the user does a recvmsg() or a poll() on the socket, we will
DM> notice the bad checksum then and increment InErrors. We could in
DM> this case correct the InDatagrams counter by decrementing it in
DM> this case.

Does that mean that InDatagrams can decrease? I would expect some
programs to interpret that as counter overflow.

/Benny

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html