lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:27:43 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET : rt_check_expire() can take a long time, add a

From: Andi Kleen <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:46:40 +0100

> > The 25.000.000 ns and 88.000.000 ns numbers where on an empty table, but 
> > large (16 MB of memory)
> This would mean that cond_resched() needs ~4x as much time as checking
> an empty bucket. I find that somewhat hard to believe.

Based upon Arjan's analysis of the stall created by the
cond_resched() assembler, this doesn't surprise me.

I also don't believe Eric would make up such numbers or
measure them carelessly and then present them as fact.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists