[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071119152933.GA19126@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:29:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, wangchen@...fujitsu.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter
> > >
> > > All of our options suck, we just have to choose the least sucking one
> > > and right now to me that's decrementing the counter as much as I
> > > empathize with the SNMP application overflow detection issue.
> >
> > If the SNMP monitor detects an false overflow the error it reports
> > will be much worse than a single missing packet. So you would replace
> > one error with a worse error.
>
> This can be fixed, the above cannot.
I don't see how, short of breaking the interface
(e.g. reporting 64bit or separate overflow counts)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists