netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071119.002604.208363785.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:26:04 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	andi@...stfloor.org, wangchen@...fujitsu.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket
 filter

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:09:29 +0800

> In any case, I just looked up RFC1213 and it says:
> 
>           udpInDatagrams OBJECT-TYPE
>               SYNTAX  Counter
>               ACCESS  read-only
>               STATUS  mandatory
>               DESCRIPTION
>                       "The total number of UDP datagrams delivered to
>                       UDP users."
>               ::= { udp 1 }
> 
> So I think incrementing it in recvmsg is acceptable.

Point taken, thanks for checking that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html