[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120145151.GC3244@fluff.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:51:52 +0000
From: Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>
To: dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm9000: fix spinlock issue and introduce platform_init
callback
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:43:42PM +0300, dmitry pervushin wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The patch below is intended to fix two problems:
> - trying to acquire spinlock twice on timeout condition
I'll have a look into this, although I think we may be better of
not dropping the spinlock and simply moving it out of
dm9000_init_dm9000() and ensure all callers of this function
hold the lock already.
> - create callback than can be used by platform code to initialize the
> chip
Hi, what purpose is the callback for? and if it takes a platform
device why is the prototype for 'void *' ?
This should have also been two seperate patches as there are two
different issues.
> Signed-off-by: dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@...il.com>
> Index: linux/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> +++ linux/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> @@ -335,8 +335,11 @@ static void dm9000_timeout(struct net_de
>
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
> dm9000_reset(db);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock,flags);
> +
> dm9000_init_dm9000(dev);
> /* We can accept TX packets again */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock,flags);
> dev->trans_start = jiffies;
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>
> @@ -526,6 +529,8 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde
> db->dumpblk = pdata->dumpblk;
> }
>
> + if (pdata && pdata->platform_init)
> + pdata->platform_init(pdev);
> dm9000_reset(db);
>
> /* try two times, DM9000 sometimes gets the first read wrong */
> @@ -1155,10 +1160,13 @@ dm9000_drv_resume(struct platform_device
> {
> struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> board_info_t *db = (board_info_t *) ndev->priv;
> + struct dm9000_plat_data *pdata = dev->dev.platform_data;
>
> if (ndev) {
>
> if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> + if (pdata && pdata->platform_init)
> + pdata->platform_init(dev);
> dm9000_reset(db);
> dm9000_init_dm9000(ndev);
>
> Index: linux/include/linux/dm9000.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/dm9000.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/dm9000.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ struct dm9000_plat_data {
> void (*inblk)(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int len);
> void (*outblk)(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int len);
> void (*dumpblk)(void __iomem *reg, int len);
> +
> + /* platform init, if any */
> + void (*platform_init)(void *);
> };
>
> #endif /* __DM9000_PLATFORM_DATA */
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists